Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7500
Impressions of the new Nikon D7500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leif" data-source="post: 616552" data-attributes="member: 42585"><p>I must admit I find that view rather bizarre. The resolution and DR are virtually identical. The D7500 adds an articulating LCD, which is incredibly useful, albeit only in one axis, not two. It adds an electronic shutter, which is very useful. The AF will be improved despite the same number of AF points. The buffer is increased to 50 14bit RAW shots at 8 FPS no less, which is more than enough for most amateurs surely, even those that shoot motor sports, aircraft and ice hockey. The metering now includes highlight priority which is excellent, I use it all the time. The D500 white balance is top rate, not sure if it bests the D7200. It has the video capabilities of the D500 which exceed those of the D7200, not that I have ever used video, I don't even know how to. The sealing is improved. The build is presumably at least as strong. As for the two card slots, how many (non pro) people really use two card slots and need them? They have to differentiate it from the D500 somehow, and that is one way to do it. </p><p></p><p>I think the truth is that the D7200 is superb. However, I believe it has the same form factor (shape) as the D600, which for me is execrable. I love the D600 features, but the shape is really unpleasant to hold. The D500 is superb to hold, and I think the D7500 is more like the D500. Please correct me if I am wrong about the shape. The D7200 is a lovely camera, the D7500 in many respects is a worhty successor, though it does seem that almost noone here agrees. :beguiled:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leif, post: 616552, member: 42585"] I must admit I find that view rather bizarre. The resolution and DR are virtually identical. The D7500 adds an articulating LCD, which is incredibly useful, albeit only in one axis, not two. It adds an electronic shutter, which is very useful. The AF will be improved despite the same number of AF points. The buffer is increased to 50 14bit RAW shots at 8 FPS no less, which is more than enough for most amateurs surely, even those that shoot motor sports, aircraft and ice hockey. The metering now includes highlight priority which is excellent, I use it all the time. The D500 white balance is top rate, not sure if it bests the D7200. It has the video capabilities of the D500 which exceed those of the D7200, not that I have ever used video, I don't even know how to. The sealing is improved. The build is presumably at least as strong. As for the two card slots, how many (non pro) people really use two card slots and need them? They have to differentiate it from the D500 somehow, and that is one way to do it. I think the truth is that the D7200 is superb. However, I believe it has the same form factor (shape) as the D600, which for me is execrable. I love the D600 features, but the shape is really unpleasant to hold. The D500 is superb to hold, and I think the D7500 is more like the D500. Please correct me if I am wrong about the shape. The D7200 is a lovely camera, the D7500 in many respects is a worhty successor, though it does seem that almost noone here agrees. :beguiled: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7500
Impressions of the new Nikon D7500
Top
