Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elliot87" data-source="post: 553293" data-attributes="member: 25183">Found the article I was looking for, unfortunately it doesn't cover the 16-300mm or 28-300mm lenses. <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/best-telephoto-lens-1308816" target="_blank">12 best telephoto lenses 2015: the best lenses for Canon &amp; Nikon DSLRs | TechRadar</a>When I was looking for a 300mm as my main wildlife lens, the VR/VC 70-300mm were the best option. Now I have a longer sharper wildlife lens I'd personally rather have something like the 16-300mm as it would make a much better travel lens for me, as it is significantly smaller and lighter and would mean I only have to pack one lens instead of two or three. Whichever way you do decide to go some form of VR is very useful as the lenses don't let in much light and without VR at 300mm you will need a minimum of 1/300th second to get sharp shots and nearer to 1/500th if you're using a crop sensor camera.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elliot87, post: 553293, member: 25183"] Found the article I was looking for, unfortunately it doesn't cover the 16-300mm or 28-300mm lenses. [url=http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/best-telephoto-lens-1308816]12 best telephoto lenses 2015: the best lenses for Canon & Nikon DSLRs | TechRadar[/url] When I was looking for a 300mm as my main wildlife lens, the VR/VC 70-300mm were the best option. Now I have a longer sharper wildlife lens I'd personally rather have something like the 16-300mm as it would make a much better travel lens for me, as it is significantly smaller and lighter and would mean I only have to pack one lens instead of two or three. Whichever way you do decide to go some form of VR is very useful as the lenses don't let in much light and without VR at 300mm you will need a minimum of 1/300th second to get sharp shots and nearer to 1/500th if you're using a crop sensor camera. [/QUOTE]

Verification