Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Im Confused ... (not difficult)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 504315" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Agreed. Getting rid of Photoshop, in any way, shape or form, amounts to killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.</p><p></p><p>PS is used not just by photographers for raster graphics, it also has tools for working with vector based graphics and as such is used by graphic designers, fashion designers and web designers. It's used by architects, commercial printers and web designers and that's just off the top of my head. </p><p></p><p>I think a far more logical path has Lightroom, or at least some of it's core features, being "absorbed" into Photoshop. This would be consistent with Adobe's Creative Cloud distribution model, which is clearly not going anywhere. Right now Lr can still be purchased outside of Creative Cloud but I'm wondering how much longer that will last. Sometime after Lr goes the way of the Cloud, I see it merging with PS giving Adobe uses a simple (if singular) path for ALL types of graphic editing, not just raster based graphics for photographers but both raster and vector: Photoshop, InDesign and Illustrator; all controlled via Creative Cloud. Photoshop, in this plan, would fulfill the pivotal role between the two graphical image "worlds". It's a clean, logical path as I see it. The relevant question for Lightroom users, I think, is... Just how committed is Adobe to Lightroom and its current distribution model?</p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 504315, member: 13090"] Agreed. Getting rid of Photoshop, in any way, shape or form, amounts to killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. PS is used not just by photographers for raster graphics, it also has tools for working with vector based graphics and as such is used by graphic designers, fashion designers and web designers. It's used by architects, commercial printers and web designers and that's just off the top of my head. I think a far more logical path has Lightroom, or at least some of it's core features, being "absorbed" into Photoshop. This would be consistent with Adobe's Creative Cloud distribution model, which is clearly not going anywhere. Right now Lr can still be purchased outside of Creative Cloud but I'm wondering how much longer that will last. Sometime after Lr goes the way of the Cloud, I see it merging with PS giving Adobe uses a simple (if singular) path for ALL types of graphic editing, not just raster based graphics for photographers but both raster and vector: Photoshop, InDesign and Illustrator; all controlled via Creative Cloud. Photoshop, in this plan, would fulfill the pivotal role between the two graphical image "worlds". It's a clean, logical path as I see it. The relevant question for Lightroom users, I think, is... Just how committed is Adobe to Lightroom and its current distribution model? [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Im Confused ... (not difficult)
Top