Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mauiarcher" data-source="post: 641223" data-attributes="member: 39516">I would buy d750 again in a heart beat for the low light advantages, focusing, and f2f you can usually get faster glass.&nbsp; That being said, I think it is a better people camera if you really want to split hairs.&nbsp; There is no perfect 1 camera for everything in my opinion....except maybe the d850 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; Just kidding.&nbsp; You may want to check out a used d810 for your stated needs.&nbsp; I think the d750 would be better for &quot;street photography&quot; but city and landscape on a tripod, d810 hands down.&nbsp; 50 base iso, more megapixel for cropability, no AA&nbsp; filter etc.&nbsp; They can be had relatively cheap and best camera for the money in my opinion.&nbsp; Only real under performance might be low light people/street vs d750 or d7200.Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mauiarcher, post: 641223, member: 39516"] I would buy d750 again in a heart beat for the low light advantages, focusing, and f2f you can usually get faster glass. That being said, I think it is a better people camera if you really want to split hairs. There is no perfect 1 camera for everything in my opinion....except maybe the d850 ;) Just kidding. You may want to check out a used d810 for your stated needs. I think the d750 would be better for "street photography" but city and landscape on a tripod, d810 hands down. 50 base iso, more megapixel for cropability, no AA filter etc. They can be had relatively cheap and best camera for the money in my opinion. Only real under performance might be low light people/street vs d750 or d7200. Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification