Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
If you had to do it over again, would you buy the D750 again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 638687" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I would absolutely buy the D750 again. Without hesitation.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p><p></p><p>I shot DX for a long time, then and owned and shot with a D7100 and a D750 and now I shoot with the D750 exclusively. I don't think of shooting with an FX body as an "upgrade" to shooting a DX body, it's a lateral move if you ask me. I can't really say if switching from DX to FX was "worth it" or not because I don't see the move in those terms. I moved to a full-frame body because that's the direction my photography took. </p><p></p><p>Moving to FX instead of DX didn't make me a <em>better</em> photographer, but it very well may have changed the <em>kind of</em> photographer I'm becoming.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p><p></p><p>Since the total number of pixels is, as you point out, essentially the same (24 million, give or take) the pixels on the full-frame sensor are, obviously, larger than the pixels on the smaller DX sensor. Having larger pixels helps when shooting in low light, primarily. How much it helps is a little more subjective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 638687, member: 13090"] I would absolutely buy the D750 again. Without hesitation. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] I shot DX for a long time, then and owned and shot with a D7100 and a D750 and now I shoot with the D750 exclusively. I don't think of shooting with an FX body as an "upgrade" to shooting a DX body, it's a lateral move if you ask me. I can't really say if switching from DX to FX was "worth it" or not because I don't see the move in those terms. I moved to a full-frame body because that's the direction my photography took. Moving to FX instead of DX didn't make me a [I]better[/I] photographer, but it very well may have changed the [I]kind of[/I] photographer I'm becoming. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] Since the total number of pixels is, as you point out, essentially the same (24 million, give or take) the pixels on the full-frame sensor are, obviously, larger than the pixels on the smaller DX sensor. Having larger pixels helps when shooting in low light, primarily. How much it helps is a little more subjective. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
If you had to do it over again, would you buy the D750 again?
Top