Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Browncoat" data-source="post: 17532" data-attributes="member: 1061">I can't decide what's worse: the fact that there is a need for a website called Photo Attorney, or that this guy has his shorts in a wad over something so trite.Intellectual property copyright law can get downright ridiculous at times...this is one of them.  Here's someone who is contacted by a book publisher who wants to purchase some of his work.  He declines and then whines about seeing something vaguely similar on a book cover 3 years later?  I missed the part where he owned the rights to snow, clotheslines, and run down houses.  Personally, I think the photo on the book is better anyway.</blockquote>