Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wev" data-source="post: 428641" data-attributes="member: 16783"><p>Yes, but again, to what use? I shoot 100-200 flower and plant images a year for the department. They are used, sized 2" x 3" for our sale cards or the online ID database. In both cases, RAW files are pointless excess for the intended use. How many of us here print 4' x 6' posters on a regular basis? Or shot for Vogue or Sports Illustrated? Looking at the images posted here, good, bad, or otherwise: I could not guess at the original file format nor do I care to know. Would people like my images more if I had started in RAW and jiggered down to a finished jpeg? I hope that they like them because I captured (as luck would have it) something of interest, not because I fiddled things. A good image is a good image -- when in doubt shoot three and accept your losses; no one is perfect every time and no format will save you when you aren't.</p></blockquote><p></p>