Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 428598" data-attributes="member: 12496">I can't always get it just right either, surprises are common, but Raw makes it be an trivial problem.&nbsp;&nbsp; I think Raw processing only takes an average of maybe 10 or 15 seconds extra per picture (since many cases can fix multiple pictures in the same one click). Much of that time involves just looking at the picture the first time, but that does include fixing white balance and exposure, fixing crop and straightening, and sometimes altering standard color profile (Neutral for portraits, maybe Vivid for a few landscapes, etc).&nbsp; And resampling for print size, and batch output of corrected image to JPG for use.&nbsp; Processing only one picture might take a bit longer, but processing a few hundred does not (average of each).&nbsp; We get pretty good at it.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Anyone that can't spare a few more seconds on each picture is sure never going to make JPG be correct.&nbsp; Raw is the easy, fast and good way.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 428598, member: 12496"] I can't always get it just right either, surprises are common, but Raw makes it be an trivial problem. I think Raw processing only takes an average of maybe 10 or 15 seconds extra per picture (since many cases can fix multiple pictures in the same one click). Much of that time involves just looking at the picture the first time, but that does include fixing white balance and exposure, fixing crop and straightening, and sometimes altering standard color profile (Neutral for portraits, maybe Vivid for a few landscapes, etc). And resampling for print size, and batch output of corrected image to JPG for use. Processing only one picture might take a bit longer, but processing a few hundred does not (average of each). We get pretty good at it. ;) Anyone that can't spare a few more seconds on each picture is sure never going to make JPG be correct. Raw is the easy, fast and good way. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification