Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dave_W" data-source="post: 109314" data-attributes="member: 9521">I agree with Marcel, lose the 85 f/1.4 and get the 85 f/1.8G, the highest rated lens ever tested by DxO and I would also suggest losing the 24 f/1.4. It's a very expensive lens that is covered by both your 14-24 and 24-70. Consider instead the 28mm f/1.8G. It's much cheaper and the difference of 4mm vs. $1000+ in cost doesn't really balance. Also, consider your telephoto reach. Right now you're stuck at 200mm, consider a TC for your 70-200 or buy the inexpensive but very nice 70-300mm. It's not the fastest lens but solid and does a great job.Ha ha, I just realized, if you take all my suggestions you'll end up with the same set of lenses I have....who coulda known?!?&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dave_W, post: 109314, member: 9521"] I agree with Marcel, lose the 85 f/1.4 and get the 85 f/1.8G, the highest rated lens ever tested by DxO and I would also suggest losing the 24 f/1.4. It's a very expensive lens that is covered by both your 14-24 and 24-70. Consider instead the 28mm f/1.8G. It's much cheaper and the difference of 4mm vs. $1000+ in cost doesn't really balance. Also, consider your telephoto reach. Right now you're stuck at 200mm, consider a TC for your 70-200 or buy the inexpensive but very nice 70-300mm. It's not the fastest lens but solid and does a great job. Ha ha, I just realized, if you take all my suggestions you'll end up with the same set of lenses I have....who coulda known?!? ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification