Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
I got the Nikon AF-S 50MM F/1.8G Prime Lens on sale, but I'm not sure I need it..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 652414" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Given the choice between the 35mm and 50mm f/1.8G's on a DX body -- and those two lenses ONLY -- I'd choose the 35mm. I say that while confirming that the 50mm f/1.8G does deliver slightly better overall performance, generally speaking, as compared to the 35mm. I can't say for sure that's due to the 50mm f/1.8G being an FX lens or not but I have my suspicions. I do not consider <strong>either</strong> lens suitable for portraits, except full-body (as opposed to head-shots or head-and-shoulder shots) and even then I'd reach for something, almost anything, with more focal length such as an 85mm or 135mm if I had the opportunity. But, keeping this to the two lenses in question, the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G and the 50mm f/1.8G, I find the 35mm is the more flexible lens of the two on a DX body. Further, unless you're shooting raw, and post-processing your shots, I have to wonder if you'd really see the image quality difference between the two. In short, I don't think this is a decision you should be losing sleep over.</p><p></p><p>If your shots are coming out a little dark when shooting indoors, invest $100 or so on <a href="https://www.amazon.com/YONGNUO-YN-568EX-Camera-Speedlite-Wireless/dp/B00B7TSRIU/ref=sr_1_14?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1514831235&sr=1-14" target="_blank">a decent flash</a> and <a href="https://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/" target="_blank">learn to use it</a>. You'll be glad you did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 652414, member: 13090"] Given the choice between the 35mm and 50mm f/1.8G's on a DX body -- and those two lenses ONLY -- I'd choose the 35mm. I say that while confirming that the 50mm f/1.8G does deliver slightly better overall performance, generally speaking, as compared to the 35mm. I can't say for sure that's due to the 50mm f/1.8G being an FX lens or not but I have my suspicions. I do not consider [B]either[/B] lens suitable for portraits, except full-body (as opposed to head-shots or head-and-shoulder shots) and even then I'd reach for something, almost anything, with more focal length such as an 85mm or 135mm if I had the opportunity. But, keeping this to the two lenses in question, the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G and the 50mm f/1.8G, I find the 35mm is the more flexible lens of the two on a DX body. Further, unless you're shooting raw, and post-processing your shots, I have to wonder if you'd really see the image quality difference between the two. In short, I don't think this is a decision you should be losing sleep over. If your shots are coming out a little dark when shooting indoors, invest $100 or so on [url=https://www.amazon.com/YONGNUO-YN-568EX-Camera-Speedlite-Wireless/dp/B00B7TSRIU/ref=sr_1_14?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1514831235&sr=1-14]a decent flash[/url] and [url=https://neilvn.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/]learn to use it[/url]. You'll be glad you did. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
I got the Nikon AF-S 50MM F/1.8G Prime Lens on sale, but I'm not sure I need it..
Top