Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
I fear the onset of NAS......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fotojack" data-source="post: 25128" data-attributes="member: 16"><p>Heather, believe me when I tell you I completely understand budget constraints! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I'm as frugal as they come when it comes to lens acquisitions. I have to be, being on a retirement budget. Having said that, your choices for a 300 lens are good ones. I went with the Nikon 55-300 because of the price and the lens quality. I love the pictures I get with it. See my shot in today's Critique forum for an example. Nothing wrong with the Sigma either. Both great choices for the budget conscious. Rick is absolutely right, though. If we all had our druthers, we'd all be shooting with 2.8 lenses or better! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Life can be cruel sometimes, eh. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I should have been born rich instead of so incredibly good looking. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fotojack, post: 25128, member: 16"] Heather, believe me when I tell you I completely understand budget constraints! :) I'm as frugal as they come when it comes to lens acquisitions. I have to be, being on a retirement budget. Having said that, your choices for a 300 lens are good ones. I went with the Nikon 55-300 because of the price and the lens quality. I love the pictures I get with it. See my shot in today's Critique forum for an example. Nothing wrong with the Sigma either. Both great choices for the budget conscious. Rick is absolutely right, though. If we all had our druthers, we'd all be shooting with 2.8 lenses or better! :) Life can be cruel sometimes, eh. :) I should have been born rich instead of so incredibly good looking. ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
I fear the onset of NAS......
Top