Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
I am not happy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ironwood" data-source="post: 416298" data-attributes="member: 10447"><p>Michael, I own the Nikon 70-300-VR, it is a very nice lens for the price. But I am not sure it will be enough of an upgrade over your 55-300 to warrant spending the money.</p><p>I also own the Nikon 105-VR, it is my favourite lens and it lives on my camera most of the time, but its not much longer than the 85 on your 16-85. And it is slower to focus than the 16-85, but it does take great photos.</p><p></p><p>I am seriously thinking of selling my 70-300 and buying a 70-200 f2.8 (probably the Tamron because of the price, the Nikon is too expensive for me) because I think thats a very useful range and worth spending some money to get a good lens, but, I will also get the 150-600 at some stage because I want the long reach for the wildlife around here. While I have a DX camera I will always keep my 16-85, but I think a good 70-200 would compliment it nicely.</p><p></p><p>I think you need to ask yourself how long do you need your lens. Do you always use your 55-300 around 200, or always at the 300 end, or do you need longer than 300 ?</p><p></p><p>Edit- sorry I have probably given you more questions than answers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ironwood, post: 416298, member: 10447"] Michael, I own the Nikon 70-300-VR, it is a very nice lens for the price. But I am not sure it will be enough of an upgrade over your 55-300 to warrant spending the money. I also own the Nikon 105-VR, it is my favourite lens and it lives on my camera most of the time, but its not much longer than the 85 on your 16-85. And it is slower to focus than the 16-85, but it does take great photos. I am seriously thinking of selling my 70-300 and buying a 70-200 f2.8 (probably the Tamron because of the price, the Nikon is too expensive for me) because I think thats a very useful range and worth spending some money to get a good lens, but, I will also get the 150-600 at some stage because I want the long reach for the wildlife around here. While I have a DX camera I will always keep my 16-85, but I think a good 70-200 would compliment it nicely. I think you need to ask yourself how long do you need your lens. Do you always use your 55-300 around 200, or always at the 300 end, or do you need longer than 300 ? Edit- sorry I have probably given you more questions than answers. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
I am not happy
Top