Hoya PRO1D CLOSE-UP No. 3

J

JDub

New member
I'm really new to photography and I can't seem to find any useful reviews on this product - Kenko Tokina USA, Inc.

I have a Nikon D7100 with 70-300mm and 16-85mm lenses, both are 67mm. I like the idea of macro photography but I can't see paying over $500 for a lens that I don't think I'd use on a regular basis. I get that this is a cheap man's macro solution and I'm okay with that as I don't expect to get the greatest images in the world.

But what I want to know is if it's a complete waste of money or could I get some decent use out of it?

Thank you for your feedback!
 
Scott Murray

Scott Murray

Senior Member
JDub said:
I'm really new to photography and I can't seem to find any useful reviews on this product - Kenko Tokina USA, Inc. I have a Nikon D7100 with 70-300mm and 16-85mm lenses, both are 67mm. I like the idea of macro photography but I can't see paying over $500 for a lens that I don't think I'd use on a regular basis. I get that this is a cheap man's macro solution and I'm okay with that as I don't expect to get the greatest images in the world. But what I want to know is if it's a complete waste of money or could I get some decent use out of it? Thank you for your feedback!
Click to expand...

Cheap mans solution is a reversed 50mm 1.4. Read some macro forums on here and where we experiment with such things and then you will find answers.

I have photos from a cheap solution including homemade diffuser.
 
M

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Cant see a price but a close up filter can be a easy starting point to test the water.don't expect brilliant results then you may be surprised,i think if you use them on a zoom you have to use the zoom for focusing as any other way can make it difficult.

mike
 
J

JDub

New member
Scott Murray said:
Cheap mans solution is a reversed 50mm 1.4. Read some macro forums on here and where we experiment with such things and then you will find answers.

I have photos from a cheap solution including homemade diffuser.
Click to expand...


Wow, I would have never thought to do that. I'm guessing that a 50mm 1.8 would work? I don't have the 1.4


Thank you all for the quick replies.
 
P

PapaST

Senior Member
1.8 could work but it's helpful if it has an aperture ring so you can manually set your aperture from the lens.

You might want to look at some extension tubes as well. Kenkos makes some decent ones that allow signal pass-thru. There are others that are cheaper.

The item you suggested would probably work but I haven't seen results so I'm not sure how well.
 
P

PapaST

Senior Member
I have this lens for whenever I do a reverse lens setup. I bought a reversing adapter to attach it to my camera. It has the aperture ring so manually adjust. Works pretty good if you don't need a ton of working distance. This one is listed on ebay for $125. It's a 28mm lens and not a bad idea since you could use it as a 28mm or a reverse lens setup.

I can't remember but I think the smaller focal length lenses give you more magnification when reversed.

Nikon AF 28mm F2 8 Wide Angle Auto Focus D600 D610 D700 D800 | eBay
 
J

JDub

New member
The Hoya Close-up +3 filter is $110 at B&H. That's not terribly expensive compared to the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Lens at $900 that I would want.

Don, I thought I filled out the pertinent information in my profile, what am I'm missing that could help?

I have a Nikon D7100 w/ 50mm 1.8, 16-85mm 3.5, and 70-300mm 4.5 lenses. Both of the zooms use 67mm filters so I figure I could use the close-up for either
 
J

JDub

New member
PapaST said:
1.8 could work but it's helpful if it has an aperture ring so you can manually set your aperture from the lens.

You might want to look at some extension tubes as well. Kenkos makes some decent ones that allow signal pass-thru. There are others that are cheaper.

The item you suggested would probably work but I haven't seen results so I'm not sure how well.
Click to expand...


My 50mm has an aperture ring. Its the 50mm 1.8D
 
G

Gbutterf

New member
My use of any added filter to substitute for either macro or wide angle has been disappointing. The loss of speed coupled with chroma etc makes the use of them in the novelty area.
You will never regret paying for good glass as the quality of your shots will last far longer than the empty wallet. Go to your dealer take your camera and try the lenses if you cannot afford a new lens look out for a used one via a reputable dealer.
 
J

JDub

New member
How likely is it that the reversed 50 could get the glass scratched (since theres no filter or hood to protect) and is it possible for dirt, sand or other debris to get into the lens? I don't know how sealed that side would be as its not probably designed to be used on reversed. I apologize for my lack of knowledge. Also, are you talking about reversing the 50 straight to the body, or connected to another lens when you're comparing to the dedicated 90mm?
 
Scott Murray

Scott Murray

Senior Member
JDub said:
How likely is it that the reversed 50 could get the glass scratched (since theres no filter or hood to protect) and is it possible for dirt, sand or other debris to get into the lens? I don't know how sealed that side would be as its not probably designed to be used on reversed. I apologize for my lack of knowledge. Also, are you talking about reversing the 50 straight to the body, or connected to another lens when you're comparing to the dedicated 90mm?
Click to expand...
Scratching any glass/lens is up to the users inability to not scratch glass, if this fails then the lenses are pretty cheap.

I am comparing a!!! hang on have a read here - http://nikonites.com/macro/16771-macro-lens-comparison.html#axzz2iUV8KVI4
 
J

JDub

New member
I've decided to order both the Close-Up Filter and the reverse adapter to see which is best and if either will give me pictures that I'm satisfied with. I figure what the heck, I have 30 days to try them out. Definitely cheaper than a Macro Lens
 
J

JDub

New member
Conclusion..... I didn't think either method provided sufficient results nor were they worth the hassle and headache it took to get the image in focus. So I guess I will just have to start saving up for a Macro lens
 
Top