Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
How useful extra 4mm range (12mm vs 16mm), lens choices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fotojack" data-source="post: 17798" data-attributes="member: 16"><p>First off, what strikes me is that you give a lot of credit to the PZ reviews. I would look at the least 2 other lens reviews on the lenses you're interested in, to get an average review. Putting all your faith in one review source does not seem prudent to me. Just my opinion.</p><p>Secondly..........trust your instincts! If the Sigma or Tokina lens feels right to you, and does the job, then go for it. Don't get too hung up on all the technicalities of a particular lens. Unless you make your living taking photographs, and every shot has to be dead on perfect in order to get paid, I'd go with the lens that gives you the results you're after. </p><p>In short, spend more time actually taking pictures, instead of worrying about how much CA or distortion there is. Honestly.....will any of your friends or colleagues notice, or will they marvel instead at the fantastic shot you took? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p>Anyway, that's how I feel about it, and all of the above are MY thoughts on the subject. Others opinion may vary. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fotojack, post: 17798, member: 16"] First off, what strikes me is that you give a lot of credit to the PZ reviews. I would look at the least 2 other lens reviews on the lenses you're interested in, to get an average review. Putting all your faith in one review source does not seem prudent to me. Just my opinion. Secondly..........trust your instincts! If the Sigma or Tokina lens feels right to you, and does the job, then go for it. Don't get too hung up on all the technicalities of a particular lens. Unless you make your living taking photographs, and every shot has to be dead on perfect in order to get paid, I'd go with the lens that gives you the results you're after. In short, spend more time actually taking pictures, instead of worrying about how much CA or distortion there is. Honestly.....will any of your friends or colleagues notice, or will they marvel instead at the fantastic shot you took? :) Anyway, that's how I feel about it, and all of the above are MY thoughts on the subject. Others opinion may vary. :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
How useful extra 4mm range (12mm vs 16mm), lens choices
Top