Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 216640" data-attributes="member: 13196">I decided to compare the number of photos between the D600 and D90. Both are set for RAW and JPEG FINE. The D600 with 2 card slots comes in at 590 photos on a 32GB card. The two D90s have different size cards. An 8GB card in a D90 set to RAW and JPEG FINE (both stored on one card) holds 352 photos while the second D90 with a 4GB card holds 175 with the same settings. Good to know!And I called Nikon asking if it would be okay for me to use the D600 tonight to photograph the theater production then send it out on Monday, and I was told it would be fine. The D600 really does much better in low light--lots LESS noise because the ISO has to be at least 1000-1250. I'll have the D90 along as a backup. Another advantage of the D600 is that I can pretty much keep a 70-200mm f/2.8 on for the entire show. When using the D90, I have to switch back and forth between that lens and a 24-70mm f/2.8.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 216640, member: 13196"] I decided to compare the number of photos between the D600 and D90. Both are set for RAW and JPEG FINE. The D600 with 2 card slots comes in at 590 photos on a 32GB card. The two D90s have different size cards. An 8GB card in a D90 set to RAW and JPEG FINE (both stored on one card) holds 352 photos while the second D90 with a 4GB card holds 175 with the same settings. Good to know! And I called Nikon asking if it would be okay for me to use the D600 tonight to photograph the theater production then send it out on Monday, and I was told it would be fine. The D600 really does much better in low light--lots LESS noise because the ISO has to be at least 1000-1250. I'll have the D90 along as a backup. Another advantage of the D600 is that I can pretty much keep a 70-200mm f/2.8 on for the entire show. When using the D90, I have to switch back and forth between that lens and a 24-70mm f/2.8. [/QUOTE]

Verification