Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Slipperman" data-source="post: 190216" data-attributes="member: 14707">how's this?[ATTACH]49259[/ATTACH]i first selected then cut out the background flower using the scissor thing then did a clone from an area to the left of the flower which i figured already contained an alike amount of fade as where the flower was then just brushed in the cut out area. the cool thing was i didn't have to worry about running over the edges of where the flower was because that area was still selected. after selecting the foreground flower (scissor thing), i inverted it then faded the rest at 85 (pixels i think).came out pretty good. it's barely discernible where the background flower used to be thanx to the fade but what i don't like is because of the fade, the flower itself now looks like it's glowing and if you blow it up, you can see irregularities where the selection was (black lines/splotches). probably something i can do to fix that but not sure what.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Slipperman, post: 190216, member: 14707"] how's this? [ATTACH=CONFIG]49259._xfImport[/ATTACH] i first selected then cut out the background flower using the scissor thing then did a clone from an area to the left of the flower which i figured already contained an alike amount of fade as where the flower was then just brushed in the cut out area. the cool thing was i didn't have to worry about running over the edges of where the flower was because that area was still selected. after selecting the foreground flower (scissor thing), i inverted it then faded the rest at 85 (pixels i think). came out pretty good. it's barely discernible where the background flower used to be thanx to the fade but what i don't like is because of the fade, the flower itself now looks like it's glowing and if you blow it up, you can see irregularities where the selection was (black lines/splotches). probably something i can do to fix that but not sure what. [/QUOTE]

Verification