Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Hot Pixels On Long Exposures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bob Blaylock" data-source="post: 226007" data-attributes="member: 16749"><p>Definitely sensor noise.</p><p></p><p> Looking at the EXIF data in this picture, I see that it was an exposure of more than fifteen minutes. To have that long an exposure, and not completely wash out the picture, there had to be very, very little light actually reaching the sensor.</p><p></p><p> There's always going to be at least a little bit of noise in the sensor, but under more normal exposure conditions, it will be insignificant compared to the actual light that is being recorded. But here, you've got very little light, so the noise is more significant.</p><p></p><p> Think of it as being like trying to watch a distant, weak station on an analog television. You get a lot of “noise”—hiss and static and “snow”. The same amount of noise is always there, but the stronger the signal, the less significant the noise appears.</p><p></p><p> Here, you're intentionally giving your camera's sensor a very weak signal, and then wondering why you see so much noise.</p><p></p><p> See also: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio" target="_blank">Signal-to-noise ratio</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Blaylock, post: 226007, member: 16749"] Definitely sensor noise. Looking at the EXIF data in this picture, I see that it was an exposure of more than fifteen minutes. To have that long an exposure, and not completely wash out the picture, there had to be very, very little light actually reaching the sensor. There's always going to be at least a little bit of noise in the sensor, but under more normal exposure conditions, it will be insignificant compared to the actual light that is being recorded. But here, you've got very little light, so the noise is more significant. Think of it as being like trying to watch a distant, weak station on an analog television. You get a lot of “noise”—hiss and static and “snow”. The same amount of noise is always there, but the stronger the signal, the less significant the noise appears. Here, you're intentionally giving your camera's sensor a very weak signal, and then wondering why you see so much noise. See also: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio]Signal-to-noise ratio[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Hot Pixels On Long Exposures
Top