Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Histogram and Dynamic Range
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 457446" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I abide by ETTR and find it works very well. The main thing is to <em>avoid blow-outs</em> because once you've blown-out, whether it be in the highlights, shadows or an individual color-channel, that's it... Detail in that range has been lost and there's no getting it back. </p><p></p><p>I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but at the same time I don't feel that point always gets the emphasis it deserves when discussing ETTR and histograms in general.</p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 457446, member: 13090"] I abide by ETTR and find it works very well. The main thing is to [I]avoid blow-outs[/I] because once you've blown-out, whether it be in the highlights, shadows or an individual color-channel, that's it... Detail in that range has been lost and there's no getting it back. I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but at the same time I don't feel that point always gets the emphasis it deserves when discussing ETTR and histograms in general. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Histogram and Dynamic Range
Top