Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Don Kuykendall_RIP" data-source="post: 472327" data-attributes="member: 6277">I worked for PhotoWorld One Hour photo a number of years ago. This was way before digital.&nbsp; I remember a one of the national meetings we had they passed a photo around for all of us to look at and see what we thought.&nbsp; Was a good looking print. They then told us it was a digital print. They did say it would be a while before we saw anything like this in the market place.&nbsp; The photo to get film quality took 2 hard drives to hold the 1 print.I think photography has it's own &quot;Moore's law&quot; type of progression.&nbsp; I would never say we have reached any limits in any photographic equipment. Saying something can never get better than &quot;X&quot; is a dangerous statement.&nbsp; The future is bright for all of us in photography. Companies like Nikon must keep up and maintain quality and when a mistake (D600) is made they really need to bend over backward to get in front of it and own the mistake and really do more than needed to make customers happy. Once that mistake was made they should have had a full recall to repair and gone out of their way to make sure all cameras came back. If the problem could not be fixed then the camera should have been replaced.&nbsp; I am picking on this one issue because we all know about it. With camera phones getting to be as good or even better then some of the point and shoots the DSLR market must surpass our wildest imaginations.&nbsp; I think it can.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Don Kuykendall_RIP, post: 472327, member: 6277"] I worked for PhotoWorld One Hour photo a number of years ago. This was way before digital. I remember a one of the national meetings we had they passed a photo around for all of us to look at and see what we thought. Was a good looking print. They then told us it was a digital print. They did say it would be a while before we saw anything like this in the market place. The photo to get film quality took 2 hard drives to hold the 1 print. I think photography has it's own "Moore's law" type of progression. I would never say we have reached any limits in any photographic equipment. Saying something can never get better than "X" is a dangerous statement. The future is bright for all of us in photography. Companies like Nikon must keep up and maintain quality and when a mistake (D600) is made they really need to bend over backward to get in front of it and own the mistake and really do more than needed to make customers happy. Once that mistake was made they should have had a full recall to repair and gone out of their way to make sure all cameras came back. If the problem could not be fixed then the camera should have been replaced. I am picking on this one issue because we all know about it. With camera phones getting to be as good or even better then some of the point and shoots the DSLR market must surpass our wildest imaginations. I think it can. [/QUOTE]

Verification