Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="petr" data-source="post: 585707" data-attributes="member: 42230">I understand your point. Nevertheless, on the dance floor there isn't any room for a flash setup and many people being photographed from close do not wish or do not like bright flashes shot right into their faces. Bounced flash is not an option eighter as the walls are too high or far or painted with other colors than white or there are no walls around when people are dancing outside under open night sky. So as you can see the situations I usualy have to capture in professional quality naturaly expected by the paying client are very challenging for the camera's electronics. Mostly such images get underexposed because ISO 12800 at 1/250s (longer times were never good enough to capture dancing people in good sharpness in those very low light conditions) is usually not enough for the sensor to collect sufficient amount of light, so extensive post-processing is the way how to make the pictures looking acceptable for my client. All the above is clear. I just do not like when I see uneven magenta cast along the edge of the frame in the processed images, it just drives me nuts. I often must get rid of it by cropping. The noise grain does not bother me that much. Do you people thing that there would be any sense to thing that D5 would help me better to achieve what I need to without dealing with heavy post-process or cropping? Does the price difference between D750 a D5 reflect the difference in RAW image quality captured in those very low light action conditions?BTW, I can't post any image showing the magenta mess now as I have only finished jpgs after all that post-processing and cropping done.</blockquote>

Verification