Hi! New Member, lens question

[Bob Blaylock]

Re: New Member ..Lens Question

I can't get link to work Bob..

Linky's no work!! How come you have a link to your reply anyway?

A joke is ruined if you have to explain it, but in this case, it was ruined when the moderators merged two duplicate threads, so I might as well explain the joke.

The OP started two different threads, in two different subforms, with the same text.

I posted a reply in each thread, linking to the corresponding reply in the other thread. When the OP wrote “I can't get link to work Bob..”, the two threads were still separate, and he didn't realize that every time he clicked on the link in my reply, it was taking him to the corresponding reply in the other thread.

Now, the threads are merged into one, but both my replies are still there, as #11 and #13. Click on the link in #11, and it will take you to #13. Click on the link in #13, and it will take you to #11. It was funnier when they were in separate threads.

 

[Horoscope Fish]

Re: New Member ..Lens Question

A joke is ruined if you have to explain it, but in this case, it was ruined when the moderators merged two duplicate threads, so I might as well explain the joke.

The OP started two different threads, in two different subforms, with the same text.

I posted a reply in each thread, linking to the corresponding reply in the other thread. When the OP wrote “I can't get link to work Bob..”, the two threads were still separate, and he didn't realize that every time he clicked on the link in my reply, it was taking him to the corresponding reply in the other thread.

Now, the threads are merged into one, but both my replies are still there, as #11 and #13. Click on the link in #11, and it will take you to #13. Click on the link in #13, and it will take you to #11. It was funnier when they were in separate threads.

I, for one, think your explanation only adds to the overall hilarity of your post which was tremendously hilarious to begin with.
....

 

[Don Kuykendall_RIP]

I always merge when someone posts identical posts. I gets really confusing when when there are the same question in two different places.

That and I just like confusing Bob Blaylock and giving Horoscope Fish a good laugh. Makes my day more enjoyable.

 

[Pretzel]

Re: New Member ..Lens Question

A joke is ruined if you have to explain it, but in this case, it was ruined when the moderators merged two duplicate threads, so I might as well explain the joke.

The OP started two different threads, in two different subforms, with the same text.

I posted a reply in each thread, linking to the corresponding reply in the other thread. When the OP wrote “I can't get link to work Bob..”, the two threads were still separate, and he didn't realize that every time he clicked on the link in my reply, it was taking him to the corresponding reply in the other thread.

Now, the threads are merged into one, but both my replies are still there, as #11 and #13. Click on the link in #11, and it will take you to #13. Click on the link in #13, and it will take you to #11. It was funnier when they were in separate threads.

From now on, I'm just going to answer all future duplicated questions with... Ask Bob HERE.

 

[stevenboo]

Re: New Member ..Lens Question

A joke is ruined if you have to explain it, but in this case, it was ruined when the moderators merged two duplicate threads, so I might as well explain the joke.

The OP started two different threads, in two different subforms, with the same text.

I posted a reply in each thread, linking to the corresponding reply in the other thread. When the OP wrote “I can't get link to work Bob..”, the two threads were still separate, and he didn't realize that every time he clicked on the link in my reply, it was taking him to the corresponding reply in the other thread.

Now, the threads are merged into one, but both my replies are still there, as #11 and #13. Click on the link in #11, and it will take you to #13. Click on the link in #13, and it will take you to #11. It was funnier when they were in separate threads.

That sir is genius more so that it's had to explained. Even with the threads merged I wonder how many people kept clicking the link but didn't realise 11 was hanging to 13. Bravo

 

[singlerosa_RIP]

a good friend has a d600 with a full lens assortment, he's decided to the fuji x-t1..wants me to buy his gear, but i really like the size of the d5300 vs. The full frame d600.. Im looking at spending about the same money either way.. Am i crazy for not buying his gear?

yes.

 

[Blade Canyon]

I'm with Singlerosa. I love the D600, and the 28-300 is a perfectly good lens for starters, regardless of whether you shoot FX or DX. Marcel has a good point that, on a DX, you may feel the 28mm is not wide enough.

You can see some shots I made with a D600 and the 28-300 lens here:
http://nikonites.com/d750/29134-help-nikon-d750-lens-choice-2.html#post424239