Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Hi everyone!.. I have a dilemma?? Lol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 72749" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>I have the 16-35 and am very happy with it. F4 is slower than 2.8, but the sheer size of the 14-24 kept me away from it. There is also the filters consideration. Plus, for the auroras you'll be using a tripod so the f4 over 2.8 would not be a handicap. The 16-35 is also a lot smaller and lighter. Great IQ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 72749, member: 3903"] I have the 16-35 and am very happy with it. F4 is slower than 2.8, but the sheer size of the 14-24 kept me away from it. There is also the filters consideration. Plus, for the auroras you'll be using a tripod so the f4 over 2.8 would not be a handicap. The 16-35 is also a lot smaller and lighter. Great IQ. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Hi everyone!.. I have a dilemma?? Lol
Top
