Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 10581" data-attributes="member: 1573">I may have gone over the top with this one. Per your suggestions, I re-processed using different combinations. I also had another group of seven where the starting point was a slower shutter speed. I also tried the combinations in several softwares (it should be apparent that I have no social life!): Photoshop, Photomatix, Oloneo, and HDR Efex Pro.Oloneo gives the most control . . . love this software and surprisingly, the worst results were with Photomatix. The most &quot;automated&quot; with best noise control was HDR Efex Pro (which is the image below). The noise was absolutely unmanageable in the others.&nbsp;I have to say this is not too far off from what I actually saw . . . the whole sky was magnificent that evening (while I was waiting for the moon to rise)!&nbsp;I think it's better than the first one I posted, but would like to know what you all think.&nbsp;[ATTACH]1058[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 10581, member: 1573"] I may have gone over the top with this one. Per your suggestions, I re-processed using different combinations. I also had another group of seven where the starting point was a slower shutter speed. I also tried the combinations in several softwares (it should be apparent that I have no social life!): Photoshop, Photomatix, Oloneo, and HDR Efex Pro. Oloneo gives the most control . . . love this software and surprisingly, the worst results were with Photomatix. The most "automated" with best noise control was HDR Efex Pro (which is the image below). The noise was absolutely unmanageable in the others. I have to say this is not too far off from what I actually saw . . . the whole sky was magnificent that evening (while I was waiting for the moon to rise)! I think it's better than the first one I posted, but would like to know what you all think. [ATTACH]1058._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification