Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Osantacruz" data-source="post: 621443" data-attributes="member: 10564">I've never noticed a difference with lower MP being better in low light but technically it's supposed to be because the pixels aren't as densely packed. DX is more densely packed when equal MP to an FX which is what is supposed to make it be not as good in low light but honestly it's so subtle most of the time I wouldn't worry about it. Whenever I use a DX and FX at the same event, I'll never notice one being clearly FX and the other clearly DX. Get FX if you want the full width of your wider lenses or DX if you zoom a lot. Having FX won't save your shot if the light is too low. Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk</blockquote>