Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Help me understand DOF a little better
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bob Blaylock" data-source="post: 501949" data-attributes="member: 16749"><p>And here is what I've come up with so far along that line.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]184145[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p> I didn't really think I wanted the human subject as far out of focus as the OP does in his vision, so I was able to use a shorter, but slower lens—my ancient 28mm ƒ/3.5 instead of my 50mm ƒ/1.4. I don't know whether the idea really works or not, or whether it needs more work and refinement. I guess this can be considered to be a crude prototype or proof-of-concept of what I have in mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Blaylock, post: 501949, member: 16749"] And here is what I've come up with so far along that line. [ATTACH=CONFIG]184145._xfImport[/ATTACH] I didn't really think I wanted the human subject as far out of focus as the OP does in his vision, so I was able to use a shorter, but slower lens—my ancient 28mm ƒ/3.5 instead of my 50mm ƒ/1.4. I don't know whether the idea really works or not, or whether it needs more work and refinement. I guess this can be considered to be a crude prototype or proof-of-concept of what I have in mind. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Help me understand DOF a little better
Top
