Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DonnieZ" data-source="post: 501589" data-attributes="member: 40831">Thanks for the replies.Yes.I'm unsure as to the focal length of the picture shown - it's somewhat of a sample image I found doing Google image search, and there's no EXIF data embedded.As for camera settings....I was shooting in aperture priority with the aperture set at f/2.8. Had camera set to AF on the brassiere. Doing review on the camera screen, brassiere was very sharp and in-focus and bed was somewhat out of focus, but not as much as I'd have liked. Moving closer to the brassiere did provide the depth of field I was looking for, however did not provide the field of view I liked. It may look a little better once I get it on the PC and into Lightroom as well - I'm not sure at the moment.It was a little late last night, and I made a lazy post without providing sample images I took. I'll have to get the raw files out of the camera and get a sample or two posted tonight when I get home.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DonnieZ, post: 501589, member: 40831"] Thanks for the replies . Yes. I'm unsure as to the focal length of the picture shown - it's somewhat of a sample image I found doing Google image search, and there's no EXIF data embedded. As for camera settings.... I was shooting in aperture priority with the aperture set at f/2.8. Had camera set to AF on the brassiere. Doing review on the camera screen, brassiere was very sharp and in-focus and bed was somewhat out of focus, but not as much as I'd have liked. Moving closer to the brassiere did provide the depth of field I was looking for, however did not provide the field of view I liked. It may look a little better once I get it on the PC and into Lightroom as well - I'm not sure at the moment. It was a little late last night, and I made a lazy post without providing sample images I took. I'll have to get the raw files out of the camera and get a sample or two posted tonight when I get home. [/QUOTE]

Verification