Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Help me spend my money!!!!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdeg" data-source="post: 96469" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>If I had that budget I would opt for the longest range I could get, especially for sports. f/2.8 should be perfect.</p><p></p><p>Have you considered the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEOH/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00005LEOH&linkCode=as2&tag=celphofor0d-20" target="_blank">Nikon 80-200 f/2.8</a>? It's currently $1,080 new with a couple nice used options on Amazon. Only thing is it doesn't have VR. The second closest Nikon is the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV8U/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002JCSV8U&linkCode=as2&tag=celphofor0d-20" target="_blank">70-200 f/2.8</a>, but it looks like the lowest you can get that for is $2k.</p><p></p><p>Regardless i don't think you'll be disappointed with a Sigma.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdeg, post: 96469, member: 1"] If I had that budget I would opt for the longest range I could get, especially for sports. f/2.8 should be perfect. Have you considered the [URL="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEOH/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00005LEOH&linkCode=as2&tag=celphofor0d-20"]Nikon 80-200 f/2.8[/URL]? It's currently $1,080 new with a couple nice used options on Amazon. Only thing is it doesn't have VR. The second closest Nikon is the [URL="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JCSV8U/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002JCSV8U&linkCode=as2&tag=celphofor0d-20"]70-200 f/2.8[/URL], but it looks like the lowest you can get that for is $2k. Regardless i don't think you'll be disappointed with a Sigma. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Help me spend my money!!!!!!
Top
