Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Help Me spend my Income Tax Refund
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 441999" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Fortkentdad, sorry about missing the important info the Mike mentioned.</p><p></p><p>Based on the lenses listed, these would be my choices:</p><p></p><p>1. <span style="color: #000000"><strong>NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4 VR II</strong> $1369 in stock -- Jake owns this lens and gets superb results with it! He also owns a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 which I also own, but he put his Siggy up for sale because this Nikon lens has longer reach. It's a lens that you won't be wanting to get rid of for a long time. It's Nikon glass with a constant f/4 aperture. Certainly a worthy investment.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span><span style="color: #000000">2. If the <strong>Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8</strong> is their latest version, I'd suggest it over the Sigma. I owned the Sigma but wasn't thrilled with it. Sigma suggested I send mine in to get calibrated, but I traded it in for my Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8. Test ratings for the Tamron are excellent, too. </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 441999, member: 13196"] Fortkentdad, sorry about missing the important info the Mike mentioned. Based on the lenses listed, these would be my choices: 1. [COLOR=#000000][B]NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4 VR II[/B] $1369 in stock -- Jake owns this lens and gets superb results with it! He also owns a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 which I also own, but he put his Siggy up for sale because this Nikon lens has longer reach. It's a lens that you won't be wanting to get rid of for a long time. It's Nikon glass with a constant f/4 aperture. Certainly a worthy investment. [/COLOR][COLOR=#000000]2. If the [B]Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8[/B] is their latest version, I'd suggest it over the Sigma. I owned the Sigma but wasn't thrilled with it. Sigma suggested I send mine in to get calibrated, but I traded it in for my Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8. Test ratings for the Tamron are excellent, too. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Help Me spend my Income Tax Refund
Top