Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Help Me spend my Income Tax Refund
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 435061" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>The reason I'm thinking of adding a dedicated monopod to my clutter is pure laziness. I can take the leg off of my Benro and then mount a head onto it. And I do, occasionally. I like to do that when I take my long lens out for a walk. With the old Tammy 200-400 it is a big lens - 4 pounder. And long. When I shoot long with it I think it really could benefit from being mounted. Tripod is idea, but if not a tri, then a monopod is better than hand held. I could also get a monopod a little longer than my Benro. I shoot birds (occasional squirrel and whatever else gets in front of my lens) but frequently I'm shooting up a tree. On the pod when I tilt the camera to point up, way up, I need to bend down to look up into camera. A taller pod would reduce the bending I need to do. (Did I mention the primary cause is laziness?). What I'm thinking is if I had a ready to go monopod with pan-tilt head (I already have an old one of these) then I'd be more likely to grab and go. While the "transfunctional" feature of the Benro is handy when I'm travelling and want to travel light, I'm thinking having that monopod (a longer one) ready to go might encourage more photo-walks - and more walks is a good thing. Better photo's while out on my photo-walks bonus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 435061, member: 24285"] The reason I'm thinking of adding a dedicated monopod to my clutter is pure laziness. I can take the leg off of my Benro and then mount a head onto it. And I do, occasionally. I like to do that when I take my long lens out for a walk. With the old Tammy 200-400 it is a big lens - 4 pounder. And long. When I shoot long with it I think it really could benefit from being mounted. Tripod is idea, but if not a tri, then a monopod is better than hand held. I could also get a monopod a little longer than my Benro. I shoot birds (occasional squirrel and whatever else gets in front of my lens) but frequently I'm shooting up a tree. On the pod when I tilt the camera to point up, way up, I need to bend down to look up into camera. A taller pod would reduce the bending I need to do. (Did I mention the primary cause is laziness?). What I'm thinking is if I had a ready to go monopod with pan-tilt head (I already have an old one of these) then I'd be more likely to grab and go. While the "transfunctional" feature of the Benro is handy when I'm travelling and want to travel light, I'm thinking having that monopod (a longer one) ready to go might encourage more photo-walks - and more walks is a good thing. Better photo's while out on my photo-walks bonus. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Help Me spend my Income Tax Refund
Top