Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Belo" data-source="post: 279673" data-attributes="member: 11339">Thanks Dave, I am with you on the 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8 and the 105mm 2.8 having owned these before and wouldn't think twice to get them again. I used the 14-24 and the 70-200 much more than the 24-70 as the range worked for me. I currently have a 50mm 1.8 D and 85mm 1.8 D which I got for a steal and would never part with them. I am interested to know about your experience with the 300mm albeit way out of my price range for now <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown    :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>