Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Help decide between 2 lenses - URGENT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mycenius" data-source="post: 168323" data-attributes="member: 14714"><p>Mike, What are your thoughts on the IQ between the two at the different focal lengths? I've been umming and ahhing for a while over what to buy and am about to pull the lever on a 70-300, although probably the Tamron not the Nikon (solely because it's $100+ cheaper here, opens wider f/4 vs. f/4.5, and is arguably a fraction sharper than the Nikon at the longer zooms IIRC). I really wanted to get a 70-200 f/2.8 or f/4 (or even the 80-200 f/2.8) but exactly as you say they are costly & heavy - and as I mostly will be carrying mine either on day hikes/bush walks, or when travelling, the weight saving is probably more significant.</p><p></p><p>I'm turning into a bit of a fast glass addict...! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>Would love to hear if you have done any direct comparisons... Either way all these lenses are fantastic by the sounds of it - and for no pro or semi-pro enthusiasts like me I suspect the 70-300 (either one) will be a pretty stunning lens when used right!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mycenius, post: 168323, member: 14714"] Mike, What are your thoughts on the IQ between the two at the different focal lengths? I've been umming and ahhing for a while over what to buy and am about to pull the lever on a 70-300, although probably the Tamron not the Nikon (solely because it's $100+ cheaper here, opens wider f/4 vs. f/4.5, and is arguably a fraction sharper than the Nikon at the longer zooms IIRC). I really wanted to get a 70-200 f/2.8 or f/4 (or even the 80-200 f/2.8) but exactly as you say they are costly & heavy - and as I mostly will be carrying mine either on day hikes/bush walks, or when travelling, the weight saving is probably more significant. I'm turning into a bit of a fast glass addict...! :rolleyes: :cool: Would love to hear if you have done any direct comparisons... Either way all these lenses are fantastic by the sounds of it - and for no pro or semi-pro enthusiasts like me I suspect the 70-300 (either one) will be a pretty stunning lens when used right! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Help decide between 2 lenses - URGENT
Top