Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SJD" data-source="post: 163479" data-attributes="member: 13779">Thank you all for great replies. Yes. i get the message clearly. It seems overwhelmingly 70-300mm is recommended over 55-300mm. Actually i tries both lenses yesterday, i always wanted to buy 55-300mm but when i was testing suddenly 70-300mm pictures looked better, thats what halted my decision. Please help me answer the following also. possibly Yes Yes 1. You all feel that spending extra $200 worth for &quot;Internal Focusing&quot; feature ?2. My camera is 5200 and i may not go for a full frame for the next 5 years. Is it still worth it ?You guys very successfully convinced me on 70-300mm <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> please help me on the last 2 questions as well..</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SJD, post: 163479, member: 13779"] Thank you all for great replies. Yes. i get the message clearly. It seems overwhelmingly 70-300mm is recommended over 55-300mm. Actually i tries both lenses yesterday, i always wanted to buy 55-300mm but when i was testing suddenly 70-300mm pictures looked better, thats what halted my decision. Please help me answer the following also. possibly Yes Yes 1. You all feel that spending extra $200 worth for "Internal Focusing" feature ? 2. My camera is 5200 and i may not go for a full frame for the next 5 years. Is it still worth it ? You guys very successfully convinced me on 70-300mm :) please help me on the last 2 questions as well.. [/QUOTE]

Verification