Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Help!!! D7200 or D610?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spb_stan" data-source="post: 638776" data-attributes="member: 43545"><p>Sports and low light? D3s used for what a D610 costs. But given your subject matter, and lenses, a used D7200 would be a mighty compelling choice. That would allow your budget to be stretched further for lighting or another lens. Image quality and low noise is a no brainer, the D610 but those are only incremental steps up while the D7200 is a very competent, although not the best, in 100 different traits you could need in a camera. If sports is a primary consideration( it has much more stringent requirements than street or portraiture) speed of AF, and frame rate plus extra reach (well not reach but 1.5 times less field of view with a given lens as if it was a lens with 1.5 times the focal length), the D7200 is the bargain. The D7500 will produce better JPGs and have lower noise but will be more expensive. A used camera is a good choice, the camera as a model has an excellent track record so find one with low shutter count. Used D500 should be popping up not that the D850 is trickling in and being the do all better than anything else camera that could replace the two body combo of D810 and D500 that so many people have adopted. For sports, the best Dx camera on the market is the D500</p><p>Street? Any camera produced in the last 5 years is more than enough for very satisfying images where the quality is more determined by non-camera traits, like composition, lighting, subject and lens speed(aperture). A used $200 D90 is good enough for very good street photography. In fact it is good enough for serious studio portraiture, as is the D7200.</p><p>The saying "if you don't know whether you should move to Fx, you shouldn't"or something like that, is realistic. Fx entails some costs, like weight, more expensive lenses, slower speed(unless D3, 4, 5 or D850) and bigger files. You would shoot less with Fx so unless there is a compelling reason to shift to Fx, there is no reason to. You will not see the difference in a normal print from a good Dx and a Fx. If you are printing large and viewing close, sure Fx makes sense. If doing landscapes, and printing high quality large prints, Fx has some advantages because wide angle lenses are very wide.</p><p>Nothing you stated suggests you have the compelling reason to shift to Fx.</p><p>So in order of decreasing advantage:</p><p>D500...used to save budget</p><p>D7200(new or used)</p><p>D7500(better for images in difficult conditions because it uses the imaging system of the D500 but can't be found used yet)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spb_stan, post: 638776, member: 43545"] Sports and low light? D3s used for what a D610 costs. But given your subject matter, and lenses, a used D7200 would be a mighty compelling choice. That would allow your budget to be stretched further for lighting or another lens. Image quality and low noise is a no brainer, the D610 but those are only incremental steps up while the D7200 is a very competent, although not the best, in 100 different traits you could need in a camera. If sports is a primary consideration( it has much more stringent requirements than street or portraiture) speed of AF, and frame rate plus extra reach (well not reach but 1.5 times less field of view with a given lens as if it was a lens with 1.5 times the focal length), the D7200 is the bargain. The D7500 will produce better JPGs and have lower noise but will be more expensive. A used camera is a good choice, the camera as a model has an excellent track record so find one with low shutter count. Used D500 should be popping up not that the D850 is trickling in and being the do all better than anything else camera that could replace the two body combo of D810 and D500 that so many people have adopted. For sports, the best Dx camera on the market is the D500 Street? Any camera produced in the last 5 years is more than enough for very satisfying images where the quality is more determined by non-camera traits, like composition, lighting, subject and lens speed(aperture). A used $200 D90 is good enough for very good street photography. In fact it is good enough for serious studio portraiture, as is the D7200. The saying "if you don't know whether you should move to Fx, you shouldn't"or something like that, is realistic. Fx entails some costs, like weight, more expensive lenses, slower speed(unless D3, 4, 5 or D850) and bigger files. You would shoot less with Fx so unless there is a compelling reason to shift to Fx, there is no reason to. You will not see the difference in a normal print from a good Dx and a Fx. If you are printing large and viewing close, sure Fx makes sense. If doing landscapes, and printing high quality large prints, Fx has some advantages because wide angle lenses are very wide. Nothing you stated suggests you have the compelling reason to shift to Fx. So in order of decreasing advantage: D500...used to save budget D7200(new or used) D7500(better for images in difficult conditions because it uses the imaging system of the D500 but can't be found used yet) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Help!!! D7200 or D610?
Top