Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mestre" data-source="post: 63693" data-attributes="member: 6032">Go for the D90 instead of the D5100, you'll earn a lot as you'll be able to use AF-D lens with auto focus on the D90. Just the price difference between the 50mm 1.8 G and D is almost the difference between the 2 cameras.Regarding lens, I owned a 16-85 for over 3 years and only recently sold it as I''m moving to FF lens, and as previous said it was one of the sharpest lens I worked with. The 16mm are a great wide angle and 85mm is also great for portrait. If possible, try to see the price of the D90 with the 16-85 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Or you and buy just the body and aim for a 17-50 2.8 Tamron, a great lens to begin with. It is a bit shorter than the 18-105 but very sharp and the 2.8 are very useful.My 2 cents...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mestre, post: 63693, member: 6032"] Go for the D90 instead of the D5100, you'll earn a lot as you'll be able to use AF-D lens with auto focus on the D90. Just the price difference between the 50mm 1.8 G and D is almost the difference between the 2 cameras. Regarding lens, I owned a 16-85 for over 3 years and only recently sold it as I''m moving to FF lens, and as previous said it was one of the sharpest lens I worked with. The 16mm are a great wide angle and 85mm is also great for portrait. If possible, try to see the price of the D90 with the 16-85 :) Or you and buy just the body and aim for a 17-50 2.8 Tamron, a great lens to begin with. It is a bit shorter than the 18-105 but very sharp and the 2.8 are very useful. My 2 cents... [/QUOTE]

Verification