Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bluenoser" data-source="post: 62863" data-attributes="member: 6351">Hello and welcome to Nikonites.&nbsp; Glad to have you aboard! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Hmmmm....D5100 + 16-85 or D7000 + 18-105 - tough choice.&nbsp; If it were me I'd go for the D7000 option as frankly from an image quality stand point there isn't much to choose from between those 2 lenses.&nbsp; Frankly I'd say the 18-105 might be the slightly sharper of the two.&nbsp; However, if you prefer your lenses to have a bit more heft to them, then the 16-85 would be a better choice.&nbsp; Honestly, there is no bad option here - you'll have a winner no matter what you choose! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="bluenoser, post: 62863, member: 6351"] Hello and welcome to Nikonites. Glad to have you aboard! :) Hmmmm....D5100 + 16-85 or D7000 + 18-105 - tough choice. If it were me I'd go for the D7000 option as frankly from an image quality stand point there isn't much to choose from between those 2 lenses. Frankly I'd say the 18-105 might be the slightly sharper of the two. However, if you prefer your lenses to have a bit more heft to them, then the 16-85 would be a better choice. Honestly, there is no bad option here - you'll have a winner no matter what you choose! :) [/QUOTE]

Verification