Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chris1983" data-source="post: 187101" data-attributes="member: 16103">Wow, thank you all for the kind and warm reception; what nice folks!I'm certainly trying to avoid going gray(er) regarding my choice of camera. I want to get that choice right, as my wife and I will most likely have this as our primary camera for a good deal of time. As ANY of the Nikons mentioned are going to be a complete new world for us, I'm trying to navigate that territory between not over-reaching/spending for features that look &quot;cool&quot;, but that I probably will never really utilize, versus passing up some great things that I may not understand now, but will as I gain more experience, all for the sake of saving $75-$150. The D3100 looks to be a terrific camera, but are the benefits and advances of the D3200 or D5100 worth that extra $75-$150 for an entry-level newbie like me? Sigh. I think I need to have some breakfast and watch some English Premier League soccer.&nbsp; :highly_amused:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chris1983, post: 187101, member: 16103"] Wow, thank you all for the kind and warm reception; what nice folks! I'm certainly trying to avoid going gray(er) regarding my choice of camera. I want to get that choice right, as my wife and I will most likely have this as our primary camera for a good deal of time. As ANY of the Nikons mentioned are going to be a complete new world for us, I'm trying to navigate that territory between not over-reaching/spending for features that look "cool", but that I probably will never really utilize, versus passing up some great things that I may not understand now, but will as I gain more experience, all for the sake of saving $75-$150. The D3100 looks to be a terrific camera, but are the benefits and advances of the D3200 or D5100 worth that extra $75-$150 for an entry-level newbie like me? Sigh. I think I need to have some breakfast and watch some English Premier League soccer. :highly_amused: [/QUOTE]

Verification