Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
hello from a Brit in USA!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 73556" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>Well Mandy it has been monsoon, hail and lightning in Manchester today! I think it would have been nicer in New Orleans.</p><p></p><p>Go for the 35mm rather than 50mm, it will be more useful, although the 50mm is good for portrait type stuff. I even found the 35mm a little tight after the flexibility of the 18-200 but it is a nice lens for the money. If you got the latter you could skip the others altogether. I don't care what anybody says it will provide great pictures until you become a glass snob. Both my wife and I have one. </p><p></p><p>I do like sharp glass but the 18-200 spends more time on the camera than my 70-200 2.8, the 11-16 ultra wide or the 35mm prime. Yes they are all superior, but I know I can get the shot with the 18-200 without changing lenses or carrying a heavy bag.</p><p></p><p>Having said all that, if you've set a budget I'm sure you'll be very have with your choices. As I'm finding more and more, I would swap all my good stuff for a decent eye for a picture which I sadly don't possess without trying quite hard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 73556, member: 8705"] Well Mandy it has been monsoon, hail and lightning in Manchester today! I think it would have been nicer in New Orleans. Go for the 35mm rather than 50mm, it will be more useful, although the 50mm is good for portrait type stuff. I even found the 35mm a little tight after the flexibility of the 18-200 but it is a nice lens for the money. If you got the latter you could skip the others altogether. I don't care what anybody says it will provide great pictures until you become a glass snob. Both my wife and I have one. I do like sharp glass but the 18-200 spends more time on the camera than my 70-200 2.8, the 11-16 ultra wide or the 35mm prime. Yes they are all superior, but I know I can get the shot with the 18-200 without changing lenses or carrying a heavy bag. Having said all that, if you've set a budget I'm sure you'll be very have with your choices. As I'm finding more and more, I would swap all my good stuff for a decent eye for a picture which I sadly don't possess without trying quite hard. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
hello from a Brit in USA!
Top