Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 447039" data-attributes="member: 13090">Re: What lenses to take to Europe.Don't know if you're asking me or not but I'm not a huge fan, generally, of Nikon &quot;G&quot; lenses. But I have owned a few and I own one now. That being said, 20mm on an FX body is pretty damn wide but it's also a pretty damn good lens. It's wider than I'd want, personally, but that's me. I find wide angles the hardest lenses to use well in an aesthetic sense. Most people it seems to me, think, &quot;wider is better&quot; while failing to consider that in order to get MORE in the frame everything in the frame has to be SMALLER; and that tends to make for some very busy photos with no clear subject, no power.EDIT: Here's a reviewer a lot of us around here respect and <a href="https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-20mm-f1-8g-ed" target="_blank">his review of the Nikon 20mm f/1.8G</a> for your consideration.....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 447039, member: 13090"] [b]Re: What lenses to take to Europe.[/b] Don't know if you're asking me or not but I'm not a huge fan, generally, of Nikon "G" lenses. But I have owned a few and I own one now. That being said, 20mm on an FX body is pretty damn wide but it's also a pretty damn good lens. It's wider than I'd want, personally, but that's me. I find wide angles the hardest lenses to use well in an aesthetic sense. Most people it seems to me, think, "wider is better" while failing to consider that in order to get MORE in the frame everything in the frame has to be SMALLER; and that tends to make for some very busy photos with no clear subject, no [I]power[/I]. EDIT: Here's a reviewer a lot of us around here respect and [url=https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-20mm-f1-8g-ed]his review of the Nikon 20mm f/1.8G[/url] for your consideration. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification