Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 4185" data-attributes="member: 1573">Eduard, I posted an example in my gallery.&nbsp; <a href="http://nikonites.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=1938&amp;c=3" target="_blank">mountain - Nikonites Gallery</a>This is straight out of Photomatix . . . no LR adjustments.&nbsp; You can see there's a lot of noise, still.&nbsp; (this is with the &quot;reduce noise&quot; option checked in photomatix dialog. (I'm not too proud of this image . . . I was hunting for &quot;raw material&quot; for HDR practice LOL)&nbsp;I did put a vignette on the pic (adobe junk) and that one was so easy.&nbsp; It processed nicely and very little LR adjustments necessary, and it was shot at iso400.&nbsp;I use LR 3.2 for most noise reduction, or Dfine 2.0.&nbsp; I find Dfine to be the better product EXCEPT with HDR stuff - - had some odd &quot;ghosting&quot; when applied to an HDR image.&nbsp; Again, I always consider &quot;user error&quot; first.&nbsp;Thanks for taking the time to help me, Eduard</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 4185, member: 1573"] Eduard, I posted an example in my gallery. [url=http://nikonites.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=1938&c=3]mountain - Nikonites Gallery[/url] This is straight out of Photomatix . . . no LR adjustments. You can see there's a lot of noise, still. (this is with the "reduce noise" option checked in photomatix dialog. (I'm not too proud of this image . . . I was hunting for "raw material" for HDR practice LOL) I did put a vignette on the pic (adobe junk) and that one was so easy. It processed nicely and very little LR adjustments necessary, and it was shot at iso400. I use LR 3.2 for most noise reduction, or Dfine 2.0. I find Dfine to be the better product EXCEPT with HDR stuff - - had some odd "ghosting" when applied to an HDR image. Again, I always consider "user error" first. Thanks for taking the time to help me, Eduard [/QUOTE]

Verification