Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Have you been GELDED?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnwartjr" data-source="post: 10302" data-attributes="member: 2176"><p>While the lens lacking an aperture ring is disappointing in some aspects, I have nothing but positive things to say for the 2 G lenses I picked up this year, the 70-200 2.8 VRII and 24-70 2.8.</p><p></p><p>I thought about that fact, because just buying those 2 lenses was a substantial investment, and decided that if I got to the point where I wanted to shoot film again, I would have to shoot with a F5 or F6 to get 'full' functionality out of them. </p><p></p><p>While I have many great memories of shooting film with a F3 and FM2N, they are memories. If I wanted to shoot with one of those cameras again, I could find a 43-86 or other old lenses as a novelty relatively inexpensively. If I was going to be a serious film shooter, I'd want one of the latest Nikon film bodies. Yeah, I'd be dead in the water if the batteries were dead with those bodies. Same situation I'm in with digital.</p><p></p><p>So, I guess what I'm saying is, it's a cost-cutting measure that I'm not losing any sleep over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnwartjr, post: 10302, member: 2176"] While the lens lacking an aperture ring is disappointing in some aspects, I have nothing but positive things to say for the 2 G lenses I picked up this year, the 70-200 2.8 VRII and 24-70 2.8. I thought about that fact, because just buying those 2 lenses was a substantial investment, and decided that if I got to the point where I wanted to shoot film again, I would have to shoot with a F5 or F6 to get 'full' functionality out of them. While I have many great memories of shooting film with a F3 and FM2N, they are memories. If I wanted to shoot with one of those cameras again, I could find a 43-86 or other old lenses as a novelty relatively inexpensively. If I was going to be a serious film shooter, I'd want one of the latest Nikon film bodies. Yeah, I'd be dead in the water if the batteries were dead with those bodies. Same situation I'm in with digital. So, I guess what I'm saying is, it's a cost-cutting measure that I'm not losing any sleep over. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Have you been GELDED?
Top