Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Peter7100" data-source="post: 766100" data-attributes="member: 48633">I can see you have had some good results by using various methods. I assumed the question in the poll referred to what the camera would produce without applying different noise software.For me, I would say 1000 ISO is fine without applying any noise reduction, but I would say that is&nbsp; not 'good' compared to what other cameras can produce.I haven't purchaed the Topaz Denoise as a friend with a similar pc spec to my own has had nothing but problems with it.I wasn't even aware of the Nikon denoise software, so I will have a look into that.Maybe we should have a new poll on what people think qualifies for a good high iso performance straight out of camera <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Peter7100, post: 766100, member: 48633"] I can see you have had some good results by using various methods. I assumed the question in the poll referred to what the camera would produce without applying different noise software. For me, I would say 1000 ISO is fine without applying any noise reduction, but I would say that is not 'good' compared to what other cameras can produce. I haven't purchaed the Topaz Denoise as a friend with a similar pc spec to my own has had nothing but problems with it. I wasn't even aware of the Nikon denoise software, so I will have a look into that. Maybe we should have a new poll on what people think qualifies for a good high iso performance straight out of camera ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification