Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 27916" data-attributes="member: 4399">At risk of starting something <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />, I'm going to pose my comment as a question: Between my own shots and many other moon shots on the site, why is it that I do not see any quality difference between shots taken at 200mm vs. 300mm? (a 55-200 vs the 55-300 or 70- 300)? I own a 55-200 and I realize the 300's (especially the 70-300, which I hope to get next year) are better lenses, but I honestly expected to see a bigger difference but I do not. Thoughts?</blockquote>