Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Guidance needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 198683" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Well, if it were me, I'd try to get there early and stake out a good spot in advance. It sounds like you don't have a tripod so you'll be shooting off-hand, correct? I'm assuming you will be. I'd take the 70-300mm, put the aperture at f/5.6 and meter the scene. If I could get away with a smaller aperture, so much the better but my point here being... I'd let the ISO go as high as it needed to keep my shots at 1/60s or faster with an aperture in the f/5.6 range (notice I said "range"). At 200mm your depth of field at f/2.8 is going to be miiiighty slim, probably around 6" or so if I had to guess and even less at 300mm, so I'd avoid going really wide as much as possible. I'd also use a tripod if I could... </p><p></p><p>Creatively speaking don't get hung up on the idea that every...single... shot... needs to have absolutely crisp stop-action; a little motion blur can be a nice dynamic for sports shots like these.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 198683, member: 13090"] Well, if it were me, I'd try to get there early and stake out a good spot in advance. It sounds like you don't have a tripod so you'll be shooting off-hand, correct? I'm assuming you will be. I'd take the 70-300mm, put the aperture at f/5.6 and meter the scene. If I could get away with a smaller aperture, so much the better but my point here being... I'd let the ISO go as high as it needed to keep my shots at 1/60s or faster with an aperture in the f/5.6 range (notice I said "range"). At 200mm your depth of field at f/2.8 is going to be miiiighty slim, probably around 6" or so if I had to guess and even less at 300mm, so I'd avoid going really wide as much as possible. I'd also use a tripod if I could... Creatively speaking don't get hung up on the idea that every...single... shot... needs to have absolutely crisp stop-action; a little motion blur can be a nice dynamic for sports shots like these. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Guidance needed
Top