Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Greetings from the Isle of Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted" data-source="post: 354861" data-attributes="member: 29753"><p>What a whirlwind! A month ago, I was thinking of getting back into photography after my 35mm work, 15-20 years ago. Back then, I did a bit of landscape & street views & paid portrait work. This time around, my interest is with landscape, close-up/macro to start, some paid product shots (which are already lined-up), character portraits, then maybe looking at wildlife & maybe studio portraits again later on - once funds allow for the lenses.</p><p></p><p>I've been on a journey of steep learning curves & haven't even got the camera yet! I started off aiming for the D7100 & DX lenses, changed my mind to the D610 & during the wait for the D750, I think I've finally settled on a D810. I'm seeing the camera body as something that I would hold onto for quite a while, which would give me the chance to save for glassware, instead of "upgraditus" for new bodies.</p><p></p><p>Bearing in mind the intended usage; landscape, macro, walkabout, character portraits, this is the direction of my thinking at the moment...</p><p>D810</p><p>Landscapes: Nikkor 16-35mm f4</p><p>Walkabout: Nikkor: 24-120mm f4</p><p>Macro: Nikkor 105mm f2.8</p><p></p><p>I've spent a lot of time thinking that maybe the Nikkor 24-70mm f2.8 would be better suited. Budget wise it would have to replace both the 16-35mm & 24-120mm, losing me a fair amount of wide angle & a fair amount of reach. My next change of mind is due in 30 minutes, but I'm thinking that the 16-35mm is going to give me a lot more options for landscape than just having the 24-70mm.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts & advice are very welcome!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted, post: 354861, member: 29753"] What a whirlwind! A month ago, I was thinking of getting back into photography after my 35mm work, 15-20 years ago. Back then, I did a bit of landscape & street views & paid portrait work. This time around, my interest is with landscape, close-up/macro to start, some paid product shots (which are already lined-up), character portraits, then maybe looking at wildlife & maybe studio portraits again later on - once funds allow for the lenses. I've been on a journey of steep learning curves & haven't even got the camera yet! I started off aiming for the D7100 & DX lenses, changed my mind to the D610 & during the wait for the D750, I think I've finally settled on a D810. I'm seeing the camera body as something that I would hold onto for quite a while, which would give me the chance to save for glassware, instead of "upgraditus" for new bodies. Bearing in mind the intended usage; landscape, macro, walkabout, character portraits, this is the direction of my thinking at the moment... D810 Landscapes: Nikkor 16-35mm f4 Walkabout: Nikkor: 24-120mm f4 Macro: Nikkor 105mm f2.8 I've spent a lot of time thinking that maybe the Nikkor 24-70mm f2.8 would be better suited. Budget wise it would have to replace both the 16-35mm & 24-120mm, losing me a fair amount of wide angle & a fair amount of reach. My next change of mind is due in 30 minutes, but I'm thinking that the 16-35mm is going to give me a lot more options for landscape than just having the 24-70mm. Thoughts & advice are very welcome! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Greetings from the Isle of Man
Top