Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 177282" data-attributes="member: 12496">If you want to see an actual lens test (more than ... duh... it looks OK to me)then see <a href="http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/" target="_blank">Nikon / Nikkor (APS-C) Lens Tests</a>&nbsp; for both.&nbsp;&nbsp; (right hand column)Bring up two browser pages side by side to compare.&nbsp; Look at test results at the same aperture, like f/5.6, like 24mm.&nbsp; Look at&nbsp; &nbsp; Vignetting, distortion, resolution.&nbsp; &nbsp; There is a pretty big difference, in favor of 16-85Which is a little surprising, because the extended zoom ranges normally suffer.&nbsp; &nbsp;But again, 3x price normally does buy something.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 177282, member: 12496"] If you want to see an actual lens test (more than ... duh... it looks OK to me) then see [URL="http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/"]Nikon / Nikkor (APS-C) Lens Tests[/URL] for both. (right hand column) Bring up two browser pages side by side to compare. Look at test results at the same aperture, like f/5.6, like 24mm. Look at Vignetting, distortion, resolution. There is a pretty big difference, in favor of 16-85 Which is a little surprising, because the extended zoom ranges normally suffer. But again, 3x price normally does buy something. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification