Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 55291" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>I read all the arguments about why bother with a 2.8 ultrawide for landscape etc before buying the Tokina. Whilst that statement is true, a lot of times I use it is indoors where 2.8 is really useful. In the real world you can't have a lens that's too fast, as long as it can stop down. That said it was the most expensive after the Nikon options which I did consider but ruled out (and not on cost).</p></blockquote><p></p>