Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Getting there?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Browncoat" data-source="post: 189498" data-attributes="member: 1061"><p>Eww. Yeah, that's a tough one: low-light action sports.</p><p></p><p>This is the Exposure Triangle's worst nightmare because you NEED the faster shutter speeds, you NEED to squeeze as much ISO as possible for clarity, and you NEED a wide enough aperture. There's not much room for a tradeoff.</p><p></p><p>A decent f/2.8 lens will be good enough, honestly. Of course an f/1.8 is better, but you're jacking up the price considerably just for the sake of having an additional f-stop.</p><p></p><p>Telephoto is a staple for any sports photographer, and I honestly can't think of the last time I used anything else for sports (except for MMA, because I'm a lot closer to the action, just above the cage).</p><p></p><p>I've been using a Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 for years, and it's an incredible lens for around $800 new. Even though I've grown into better cameras, I still rely on my D300s with that lens for sports because it's dead on balls accurate, reliable, and produces great photos, even at night.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Browncoat, post: 189498, member: 1061"] Eww. Yeah, that's a tough one: low-light action sports. This is the Exposure Triangle's worst nightmare because you NEED the faster shutter speeds, you NEED to squeeze as much ISO as possible for clarity, and you NEED a wide enough aperture. There's not much room for a tradeoff. A decent f/2.8 lens will be good enough, honestly. Of course an f/1.8 is better, but you're jacking up the price considerably just for the sake of having an additional f-stop. Telephoto is a staple for any sports photographer, and I honestly can't think of the last time I used anything else for sports (except for MMA, because I'm a lot closer to the action, just above the cage). I've been using a Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 for years, and it's an incredible lens for around $800 new. Even though I've grown into better cameras, I still rely on my D300s with that lens for sports because it's dead on balls accurate, reliable, and produces great photos, even at night. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Getting there?
Top