Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
gettin my feet wet in post-processsing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Needa" data-source="post: 749755" data-attributes="member: 37799"><p>Still shooting d7100 here also use darktable. As for the buffer I shoot 14 bit lossless compression so I understand, be sure your are using better cards. There were lots of conversations on this site about d7100's and cards. The buffer is no worse than a manual film advance. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>There is no reason why you can't shoot both raw and jpg for now and only process the best images. For me there are less images that get processed having become more ruthless with culling recently. Those that do get processed get individual treatment mostly, a few get the history stack copied over. </p><p></p><p>Which version of darktable are you using? As for processing I the use of the scene-refered work flow beats display-refered in version 3.2.1. Can't wait for 3.4 to hit my repo. There are quite a few resources out there for the new version already. Have you seen the recent Lightroom vs darktable comparison? </p><p></p><p><a href="https://fstoppers.com/originals/freeware-versus-subscription-part-1-can-darktables-lighttable-beat-lightrooms-537068" target="_blank">https://fstoppers.com/originals/freeware-versus-subscription-part-1-can-darktables-lighttable-beat-lightrooms-537068</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Needa, post: 749755, member: 37799"] Still shooting d7100 here also use darktable. As for the buffer I shoot 14 bit lossless compression so I understand, be sure your are using better cards. There were lots of conversations on this site about d7100's and cards. The buffer is no worse than a manual film advance. :) There is no reason why you can't shoot both raw and jpg for now and only process the best images. For me there are less images that get processed having become more ruthless with culling recently. Those that do get processed get individual treatment mostly, a few get the history stack copied over. Which version of darktable are you using? As for processing I the use of the scene-refered work flow beats display-refered in version 3.2.1. Can't wait for 3.4 to hit my repo. There are quite a few resources out there for the new version already. Have you seen the recent Lightroom vs darktable comparison? [URL]https://fstoppers.com/originals/freeware-versus-subscription-part-1-can-darktables-lighttable-beat-lightrooms-537068[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
gettin my feet wet in post-processsing
Top