Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 103701" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>I think the main advantages - aside form some small, trivial technical ones that you can read about on the web - is cost and size/weight.  I am not trying to talk the OP out of getting an FX camera - it is their money, they can do what they like.  However, there seems to be a misconception that to be a "pro", you have to go to FX and that is not true.  As pointed out, many sports (and wildlife) photographers use DX because of weight and reach.  This is not about one is better than the other.  This is about making a decision based on facts, not misconceptions.  A "profession" is one where the person makes their living at doing that particular "profession".  A professional should not be dictated by the format of camera they use.  What they produce with said camera is what counts.</p></blockquote><p></p>