Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Tutorials
FX vs. DX - Uncomplicating The Math
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moab Man" data-source="post: 268077" data-attributes="member: 11881"><p>This is a great explanation and breakdown. The only thing I would add is that one is not necessarily better than the other as much as it is the right tool for the job at hand. As I am running around here in Yellowstone I have both my D7100 and D600, and just like your explanation, my D7100 is king for pulling in the wildlife and my D600 is spectacular in the lower light times and scenery shots. If I had only my a DX or FX camera I would feel like my toolbox is half complete. Having both gives me options.</p><p></p><p>Again, great break down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moab Man, post: 268077, member: 11881"] This is a great explanation and breakdown. The only thing I would add is that one is not necessarily better than the other as much as it is the right tool for the job at hand. As I am running around here in Yellowstone I have both my D7100 and D600, and just like your explanation, my D7100 is king for pulling in the wildlife and my D600 is spectacular in the lower light times and scenery shots. If I had only my a DX or FX camera I would feel like my toolbox is half complete. Having both gives me options. Again, great break down. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Tutorials
FX vs. DX - Uncomplicating The Math
Top
